Improve support for LaTeX via MathML in documentation#221
Conversation
|
LGTM - thanks. This starts us toward improving the online doc so it has can have an impact larger than what is visible right now. I suspect our homegrown parsing limits what we can offer MathML. For example, right now we have to tag Some things to note: While this works in a "dd" tag, I don't think it works in "dt". I tried putting Also, when I look at At any rate, these can be done in a future PR. |
I can check, but in principle now
OK, but we use
The reason seems that in these blocks,
|
That is not the way "dt" is supposed to work. A lot of our formatting and WMA's formatting use Mathematical notation in the definition term.
|
|
Yep. The problem is a concatenation of several small issues:
|

This PR contains the minimal changes needed to support LaTeX expressions in the documentation.